Decision
Organize feedback against role criteria, keeping evidence, differing views & open questions visible to decision-makers.
Panelists may assess different competencies and reach different conclusions. A structured review preserves those differences and the evidence behind them so the decision owner can make an informed judgment.
.png)
Give panelists a common basis for assessing the role.
Capture findings against the competencies assigned to each reviewer.
Keep supporting responses and interviewer notes with the assessment.
Preserve each reviewer’s findings before combining the panel view.
Surface differing assessments and the questions they leave open.
Bring the panel record together for the accountable hiring manager.
Review the information captured, the evidence behind findings and the questions that still need a responsible person's attention.
Individual reviewer findings against the role criteria.
The responses and notes behind those findings.
Disagreements and areas needing clarification.
The context for the named owner’s recommendation or approval.
This workflow supports human panel evaluation by organizing evidence and scorecards for their review.
The differing views and supporting evidence should remain visible for the decision owner to examine.
Panel interviews may generate additional evidence, but this page focuses on how expert review informs the hiring decision.
The organization's named decision owner, supported by the panel record.
