Assimilation
Track role expectations through 30/60/90 days, combining work reviews and manager feedback into a role-fit and quality-of-hire report.
The hiring decision predicts that someone can perform a role. Assimilation tests that prediction against expectations published in advance, with a named assessor reviewing the evidence and the support provided.
Use the role expectations established before the reviews began.
.png){kind=small}
Review readiness, early contribution and immediate support needs.
Examine applied capability, output improvement and unresolved gaps.
Bring the milestone evidence together against the original role expectations.
Record the assessor’s conclusion, rationale and support actions.
Present the declaration and early quality-of-hire findings with context.
Bring the assessor’s conclusion, milestone evidence, support actions and early quality-of-hire findings into an inspectable record.
The named assessor’s conclusion against the published expectations.
Reviewed work and findings from the 30-, 60- and 90-day milestones.
Interventions, remaining gaps and agreed next steps.
An early outcome assessment connecting hiring expectations with demonstrated work.
No. A named human assessor reviews the evidence and remains accountable. A below-expectation check-in leads to support and documented manager action.
A role-fit declaration, supporting milestone evidence, the manager's assessment and an early quality-of-hire summary.
The evidence and reasoning should be inspectable and open to correction or reassessment through the organization's process.
No. It is an early outcome assessment. Longer-term contribution and retention require later measurement.
